Assessment of a Novel Drape Containing Acrylic and Silicone-based Adhesives When Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Lead Presenter

Presented At

Abstract

Introduction

  • Pain during removal of adhesive drapes when using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) can be an issue in wound care.
  • A novel, hybrid drape (ha-Drape*) with silicone and acrylic-based adhesive has been developed to offer an alternative to traditional acrylic drape.

Purpose
A retrospective assessment of 46 ha-Drape removals during NPWT by 10 healthcare professionals was performed.

Methods

  • A retrospective assessment of 46 ha-Drape removals during NPWT by 10 healthcare professionals was performed.

- All drapes had been applied to wounds (eg, surgically dehisced wounds) within the previous three days over polyurethane foam dressings.

  • In all but one case, NPWT was applied at -125 mmHg.

- In one case, NPWT at -50 mmHg was applied for 7 days with dressing and drape changes every 2-3 days.

  • Overall, pain was assessed as part of 39 of the 46 (84.8%) drape removals.

- A pain scale (eg, Visual Analog Scale) was used in 27 of 39 (69.2%) assessments.
- The requirement for pain medication within one hour of ha-Drape removal was noted for 13 of 39 (28.3%) cases.
- One patient that received pain medication was also assessed using a pain scale.

Results

  • There were 35 patients with an average age of 61.2 ± 13.4 years.
  • Patients had several comorbidities, including hypertension and diabetes mellitus

- The highest number of wounds were surgical dehiscences, soft tissue/open wounds, and pressure ulcers.

  • Overall, a mean pain score of 3.04 ± 3.0 before drape removal or a mean pain score of 2.23 ± 2.2 after removal of the drape was reported, which is consistent with the ha-Drape containing gentle adhesives (Table 2).
  • Opioid medications were administered in relation to 9 removals.

- Other pain medications included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and local anesthetics.

  • The most common reason given for pain medication was the removal of foam (41.2%) or removal of the foam and drape (35.3%).

Conclusions

  • Overall, data from this retrospective review suggest that the use of the ha-Drape is gentle upon removal during dressing changes, thereby potentially improving the patient experience when undergoing NPWT.

- The reported pains scores in this retrospective assessment were lower than patient-reported pain scores in previous studies when traditional drapes used with foam or gauze dressings were removed.

Important Notice: The contents of the website such as text, graphics, images, and other materials contained on the website ("Content") are for informational purposes only. The Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The content is not intended to substitute manufacturer instructions. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition or product usage. Refer to the Legal Notice for express terms of use.