The cost-effectiveness of single-use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT)* compared to traditional NPWT (tNPWT) for the treatment of chronic lower-extremity ulcers

Lead Presenter

Supporting Presenters

Cyaandi Dove, DPM
Alex Reyzelman, DPM
Dean Vayser, DPM, FACFAS
Henry Jaimes, MD, PhD

Presented At


Lower extremity ulcers such as venous leg ulcers (VLU) and diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) have a major impact on quality of life and continue to impose a substantial cost burden on health care providers.1

An increase in long-term chronic disease and an aging population means that the prevalence of lower-extremity ulcers is likely to increase.1 At a time when health care costs are constrained, health care systems need to make the best use of resources in order to minimize the impact of these demographic changes.

One of the key drivers of cost is the time to heal the wound, and strategies to improve healing outcomes are therefore an important consideration.2

NPWT is known to be an effective treatment for these wound types, and the development of single use portable canisterless NPWT has provided smaller, lighter devices for patients and their caregivers.3

A recent 161-patient RCT demonstrated a significant reduction in wound closure at 12 weeks for sNPWT compared with tNPWT.

It is important to determine the relative cost-effectiveness of alternative therapies in order to support decision-makers and policy-makers in making the best treatment policy decisions. However the cost-effectiveness of sNPWT in direct comparison with tNPWT has not been investigated. Therefore it is of interest to determine whether sNPWT is likely to be more cost-effective than tNPWT for these wound types.

1. Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, Kirsner R, Lambert L, Hunt TK, Gottrup F, Gurtner GC, Longaker MT. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen 2009;17(6):763-771.
2. Lindholm C, Searle R. Wound management for the 21st century: combining effectiveness and efficiency. Int Wound J. 2016;13 Suppl 2:5-15.
3. Hurd T, Trueman P, Rossington A, Use of a portable, single use negative pressure wound therapy device in home care patients with low to moderately exuding wounds: A case series, Osto my Wound Management, 2014; 60(3): 30-36.

Important Notice: The contents of the website such as text, graphics, images, and other materials contained on the website ("Content") are for informational purposes only. The Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The content is not intended to substitute manufacturer instructions. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition or product usage. Refer to the Legal Notice for express terms of use.