"If a patient is cold, if a patient is feverish, if a patient is faint, if he is sick after taking food, if he has a bed sore, it is generally the fault not of the disease, but of the nursing."1 —Florence Nightingale
Ouch! What an indictment of nursing and, by extension, the facility in which the nurse works. We have a lot to thank Florence Nightingale for—a brilliant woman considered to be the founder of nursing and nursing standards and the first to ever put statistics to health care, among other valuable contributions. But if the health department is coming to a facility near you or a lawyer is scrutinizing your facility with a lawsuit, make sure Florence has the day off because with a statement like that we don't stand a chance to prevail. Florence or not, over the years all pressure ulcers were generally considered avoidable. If a patient developed a pressure ulcer in our facility it was time to throw on the sackcloth and the ashes; we own "this one" and are liable for its development. Fortunately, we have now come to realize that pressure ulcers can and do occur despite best treatment and prevention measures and may be unavoidable. Official recognition of this was a huge gift to defense attorneys and more importantly to the facilities they represent.
Along Comes F-Tag 314, Now F-Tag 686
The first government recognition of unavoidability occurred in 2004 with the publication by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of F-Tag 314, titled "Pressure Sores."2 F-Tags are federal regulations for nursing homes and represent guidance for surveyors of long-term care. In F-Tag 314, facilities are required to "evaluate an individual's clinical condition and pressure ulcer risk factors; define and implement interventions consistent with resident needs, resident goals, and professional standards of practice; monitor and evaluate the impact of the interventions; and revise the interventions as appropriate." If a resident develops a pressure ulcer and the facility has performed (and documented!) all these, the ulcer was determined to be unavoidable.
Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses (WOCN) Society Position Paper: Avoidable Versus Unavoidable Pressure Ulcers (Injuries)
The purpose of this document was to "lend support to the theory that some pressure ulcers are unavoidable."3 This document contains "Supportive Statements" related to unavoidability that include risks and comorbidities, medical device-related pressure ulcers, end-of-life changes, prevention strategies, role of documentation, quality improvement programs, and education. It concludes with recommendations for needed research related to this topic.
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP)
The NPUAP has published numerous documents related to unavoidability. In 2014 it published an article detailing the results of a consensus panel related to unavoidable pressure injuries and coming to consensus that "unavoidable pressure ulcers do occur."4 This article details the multiple risk factors, intrinsic and extrinsic, for unavoidable pressure ulcer development. These will be detailed and discussed in a future blog.
In 2008, a consensus panel was convened with the goal of establishing a consensus statement about skin changes at life's end.5 Conclusions were that:
What About the Kennedy Terminal Ulcer?
A Kennedy terminal ulcer (KTU) is defined as "unavoidable skin breakdown or skin failure that occurs as part of the dying process."6 It is widely acknowledged to represent the breakdown of skin that can occur at the end of life. End-of-life skin failure can take many forms, but KTUs most often occur on the sacrococcygeal area and develop and deteriorate very rapidly. They often have a pear or butterfly appearance, and can be irregularly shaped, red/yellow/black, and similar in appearance to an abrasion or blister.7
Nurse Nightingale was dealing with an entirely different set of patients. People did not live the long lives we do (average life expectancy was around 50 at that time) and were not prone to the risk factors we acknowledge today. So, if her patients developed a "bed sore," it may well have been due to a lack of proper nursing care. In conclusion, there is lots of evidence for and expert opinion about unavoidable pressure ulcers and the fact that they indeed occur. Up next, I will detail the risk factors.
1. Nightingale F. "Notes on Nursing: What It Is and What It Is Not." (originally published in 1859; still available from multiple publishers).
2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). F-Tag 315 and F-Tag 686. 2004. www.cms.gov . Accessed January 30, 2019.
3. Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. WOCN Society Position Paper: Avoidable Versus Unavoidable Pressure Ulcers (Injuries). Mt. Laurel, NJ: Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society; 2017.
4. Edsberg LE, Langemo D, Baharestani MM, Posthauer ME, Goldberg M. Unavoidable pressure injury: state of the science and consensus outcomes. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014;41(4):313–334.
5. Sibbald RG, et al. Skin Changes at Life's End (SCALE): final consensus statement. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. http://www.epuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/SCALE-Final-Version-2009. October 1, 2009.
6. Schank JE. Kennedy terminal ulcer: the "ah-ha" moment and diagnosis. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009;55(9):40–44.
7. Kennedy KL. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in an intermediate care facility. Decubitus. 1989;2(2):44–45.
About the Author
Heidi H. Cross, MSN, RN, FNP-BC, CWON, is a certified Wound and Ostomy Nurse in Syracuse, NY. She has extensive experience caring for wound and ostomy patients in acute care as well as in long term care facilities. Currently, she is employed by CNY Surgical Physicians consulting for nursing homes in the Syracuse area, and has served as an expert witness for plaintiff and defense attorneys.
The views and opinions expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, and do not represent the views of WoundSource, HMP Global, its affiliates, or subsidiary companies.