Wound healing typically progresses through four phases: hemostasis, inflammation, cell proliferation or granulation and repair, and epithelialization and remodeling of scar tissue.1 Clinicians should achieve wound closure through a standardized framework such as the TIMERS (tissue management, infection or inflammation, moisture balance, edge or epithelialization, regeneration, and social factors) tool, which provides a comprehensive approach to wound management and optimizes the wound bed and conditions to support progression of wounds through the healing process.2
When wounds fail to progress toward healing after an appropriate amount of time, the clinical approach to wound management should be reevaluated, and advanced modalities such as cellular and/or tissue-based products (CTPs) may be considered.3 Chronic and nonhealing wounds often stall in the inflammatory phases of healing. Biofilm is present in the majority of chronic wounds and is estimated to contribute to approximately 60% of chronic wound infections.4 The presence of bacteria and their endotoxins in the wound is related to increases in inflammatory cytokines and growth factors.5 A biofilm-related inflammatory response may contribute to persistent infection and impaired wound healing because such responses have been demonstrated to impair endothelial migration and the growth of granulation tissue.5 Biofilm targets many of the components that mediate the innate immune response to the wound microbiome, including:
The components listed here all play an essential role in the inflammatory phase of healing. The release of the aforementioned excessive cytokines within the wound bed marks a prolonged inflammatory phase. The prolonged presence of neutrophils delays wound healing by releasing inflammatory factors, oxygen species, and proteinases that degrade the extracellular matrix and proteins required for healing. In addition, the process can damage healthy periwound tissue.5
How much do you know about chronic wound care? Take our 10-question quiz to find out! Click here.
Proinflammatory macrophages and increased production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) damage the wound extracellular matrix, thus creating an underlying pathologic process of chronic, nonhealing wounds. This process describes the stalled inflammation that can be observed in wounds with biofilm.5 When MMPs become imbalanced or overproduced, essential proteins are destroyed, inflammation is prolonged, and ischemia and biofilm can set into the wound. Potentially, the presence of biofilm or infection and the subsequent stalled healing degrade the condition of the wound.
Optimization of the wound environment may be achieved through the use of a variety of methods to support regulation of MMPs in the wound bed, including using basic principles of good wound healing. Using a “step down, step up” approach helps address issues of wound infection and biofilm. This approach recommends a combination of interventions, such sharp debridement, which removes senescent cells and unhealthy tissues that contribute to the overproduction of MMPs. Topical antimicrobials and/or systemic antibiotics as well as advanced wound therapies may also be considered on evaluation of the wound’s progression.6
Some dressing products support the regulation of MMP expression. These dressings include those that contain superabsorbent polymers, which can bind MMPs to reduce their activity, as well as dressings with a high ionic charge. Furthermore, these dressings may also inhibit bacterial proteases.7
CTPs may also support the restoration of normal healing functions.8 CTPs are available in a wide array of formats and compositions, including:
CTPs, in combination with biofilm-targeting strategies and the standard of care, can offer several benefits for wound healing, including protection from infection and injury. CTPs serve as a scaffold within the wound bed to provide transportation for regenerative cells and biomaterials to support the natural wound healing process.9
Providing MMPs with a sacrificial substrate, such as a collagen-based dressing or CTPs that contain collagen, may support optimization of the wound environment.10 MMPs can attack the donated collagen from the CTP instead of the healing modulators in the wound. CTPs that contain collagen and antimicrobial agent(s) may be helpful in lowering MMPs and encouraging wound closure, such as products that contain polyhexamethylene biguanide or silver, which can support bioburden control in the wound environment.11
Studies involving a bioengineered living cell CTP demonstrated activation of keratinocytes at the wound edge, restoration of fibroblast functionality resulting in MMP balance and stabilization of the wound extracellular matrix, and regulation of growth factor signaling within the wound, among other benefits to support transforming a chronic wound into an acute wound.12-14 These improved factors resulted in high closure rates in a study population.
When wounds fail to progress through the normal cascade of healing, clinicians should consider the factors that may impede wound healing, such as infection and biofilm, and utilize a targeted, multifaceted approach to restore balance and healing function in the wound environment. Advanced therapies such as CTPs may be considered an effective option in combination with standard of care in setting a chronic wound on a course to closure.
The views and opinions expressed in this blog are solely those of the author, and do not represent the views of WoundSource, HMP Global, its affiliates, or subsidiary companies.